Tag Archives: Munich

Fanfare Ciocărlia

Last night I went to see Fanfare Ciocărlia with the neighbours from across the hall, at the Muffathalle here in Munich. Fanfare Ciocărlia are a popular Romanian gypsy band whose music is the basis for parts of the Bucovina Club and Electric Gypsyland CDs that I love. It was good for the body and soul.

At the end, instead of a regular encore, the whole band walked down in to the crowd with their instruments (You don’t need an amplifier for all those trumpets, tubas, horns, clarinets, and drums), playing for another 15 minutes with the people dancing around them. Along the way, they gathered Euro notes stuck to their sweaty foreheads.

Things I brought back from the UK

I spent a few days over New Year in the U.K., visiting my sister in Swansea (on the Gower, with beautiful moorlands, stormy cliffs and surfer beaches), friends in Oxford (much prettier than expected), and shops and friends in London.

Things we brought back from the UK:

  • Bagels from the Brick Lane Beigel Bake (various online pictures: 1, 2, 3). About £2 for a dozen, wonderfully simple and chewy. You could actually make a profit by flying these to Munich and competing against the boring 3-euros-or-so-each bagels that a few cafes, such as Coffee Fellows, all seem to get from one bakery. Or someone who knows how could just make proper bagels in Munich.
  • Alpen” breakfast müsli. Named after the alps, but not to be found in Europe. Actually, they started selling small German-language packets of the non-sugar version in upmarket supermarkets, but not the regular version, and not in big enough packets.
  • Garibaldi biscuits
  • Murray Mints, not my idea.
  • A furniture brochure from Unto This Last. They now box stuff up for sending outside of London, so we should be able to place a large order and have UPS collect it and ship it over to Germany, though that’s not really compatible with their ethics.

Parallel Skiiing in Munich

People in Munich who want to learn to ski in January and February (3 weekends), without the dullness or expense of a regular ski course, should sign up to Ken Lawler’s Parallel Skiing course. It’s a fun international bunch and you’ll learn to ski confidently and safely without any of that splay-legged awkward snowplow nonsense that the locals usually learn. The trick is that you start on short skiis and get slightly longer skis each day. I did the course in 2000, and I finally persuaded my girlfriend to do the course this year, because it’s silly not to.

The next information evenings are Sunday 12th November, Wednesday 15th, and Sunday 19th. Just be at Quidde-Str. U-Bahn station at 19:00 and look for the guy with a baseball cap and a short ski. It’s best to send him an email beforehand to parallel_skiing AT gmx DOT com.

Update: Time is running out to sign up. The next information evenings are:

  • Sunday 10th December, 19:00
  • Wednesday 13th December, 19:00

Munich -> San Francisco airport security

More blather about the San Franciso trip:

The security procedure at Munich was more thorough than expected, with three security checks to pass through, with everyone having their shoes, bags, and jackets scanned slowly. The staff were aggressive, rude, and dismissive. Transatlantic flights still have the no liquids rule (very small amounts allowed in transparent bags), but other carry-on such as laptops is allowed.

Surprisingly, the officials on the U.S. side were much more pleasant, though arrivals must have their fingerprints scanned and a picture taken with a webcam. There were posters promising to treat people with respect. It might be a californian thing, because it wasn’t this good when I travelled to New York in 2000.

At San Francisco airport on the way back, most people just had the regular amount of scanning, but I was one of every N people who had special attention, going through the “puffer” machine, which blows airs at you so it can detect explosives residue. I’m sceptical that this can ever be anything other than undersensitive or oversensitive (various Irish people have been wrongly convicted for IRA attacks over the years based on false positives caused by playing cards, soap, etc), and doubt that it’s ever tested in action, but was pleased when the light went green.

They were nice about it though. I even had a friendly conversation with the guy who searched my bag and found a Toni Morrison book. He was telling me about some marriage problems she’d had recently, but after some confused googling I’ve concluded he was mixing her up with Terry McMillan (both American black female authors with male first names, and surnames beginning with M, I suppose). Until I figured that out, I liked the idea of the security guard appreciating literature.

HRB 164185 (Openismus GmbH)

Openismus GmbH now 100% officially exists. All the steps are complete. It’s done. I win. Wikipedia can tell you what a German GmbH is, so ignore my summary if you want accuracy.

This is the easiest form of company to set up in Germany (or an OHG if you are selling physical products). Anything else (such as a GbR) isn’t really a company (“Firma”) and doesn’t have limited liability like a U.K. Ltd company. It’s ridiculously difficult and expensive to set one up, compared to a U.K. Ltd company. On the other hand, you don’t need a GmbH (or GbR) to do business, and Germany makes it very easy to do freelance work without a company. In the U.K. you tend to need a Ltd company, though that’s maybe just so you can pay less tax.

In fact, a person with a GmbH pays more overall tax than an individual and a GmbH demands more (expensive) administration. Yet it’s that difficulty that gives a GmbH an air of respect. Every now and then Germans politicians discuss making it easier but then a bunch of them point out how awful that would be because some of them might fail. Hello? Jobs? Muppets.

Also, clients outside of Germany need to deal with something that’s recognizably a company without having to understand German law enough to know that you don’t need a company in Germany. Note that residents of Germany may set up a U.K. Ltd company instead, thanks to the EU, thus avoiding some of Germany’s beaurocracy, but that still looks suspicious to German clients, and isn’t common enough yet for the procedures to be well understood by German accountants. But I expect this to become accepted in future, leaving the GmbH as a provincial anachronism.

Alternatively, some EU-wide form of company will become more accepted. There’s already an SE company form, but it’s limited to companies with a minimum capital of 105,000 Euros. I’m still convinced that national governments of the EU will fight to the last to preserve their incompatible islands of tax complication. How else can they promise cash to their backers in the form of tax loopholes and allowances. The only EU-wide companies big enough to influence them are big enough to pay their accountants to deal with it.

Anyway, the process went like this.

  • Week 0: I tell the accountant that I want to form the GmbH. I’m going on holiday for three weeks, and I want everything ready by the time I get back. This includes
    • Creating a draft “Satzung” (agreement, contract) for the GmbH and sending it to me.
    • Arranging an appointment with the notary. He’s a guy who sits between you and the government, because some things are meant to be difficult. His purpose is to send you a bill for his time.
  • Week 4: Get back from holiday. Nothing has been done. Start again. My accountant is consistently unreliable, but now I’m dealing with someone new there, so there’s hope again. He gets the Satzung and the appointment with the Notar.
  • Week 5: Arrange an appointment with my bank to open the company bank account with the necessary 25,000 Euros starting capital, because the accountant says I need this before meeting the notary. But the person at the bank says that they can’t do this until I get the piece of paper from the notary. A telephone call establishes that the bank can have it its way and the notary won’t mind. Apparently Hypovereinsbank do things differently.
  • Meet the notary. His role is justified by the legal requirement for him to read your contracts aloud, such as the Satzung. He doesn’t ring a bell while doing this, but he really does sit there and read it to you, and you listen. Apparently this can take 3 hours for complex real estate deals. This costs me 418.18 Euros for half an hour of being read to. Good work if you can get it. In Romania they have other names for this, and the EU tries to stop it. But in Germany they send you a detailed bill for it.
    Update: I also received a bill from the Landesjustizkasse Bamberg for the registration and publication of the fact that it was registered, for 322.39 Euros. So that’s 740.57 Euros just for the beaurocracy, ignoring the cost of an accountant to navigate that beaurocracy for you.
  • Send the notary’s documents to the bank. They have a nice seal and piece of string in the light blue and white Bavarian colours.
  • Week 6: The bank has the documents it needs to open the “GmbH i.G” account. i.G. means in Gründung, or “being founded”. Then I am allowed to put the required 25,000 Euros into the account. That can hurt when you have zero need for capital, such as when starting a software company. Opinions differ, but I don’t think it’s something that you get to see again as an individual, because paying it back to yourself is punishable by 3 years of prison. You can’t take it as profit, because profit is what you have above the starting amount. You can use it to pay yourself a salary, but of course you’ll be paying tax on that again (you paid tax on it when you earned it in the first place as an individual), plus you pay the social security contribution on it twice (you and your company pay it), so I guess that’s about 10,000 Euros that you lose, if you never close your company, just because the starting capital requirement is so high. I believe the minimum starting capital for a U.K. Ltd company is 1 pound. A notable difference.
  • Week 7: Send the bank’s printout of the account balance to the notary.
  • Week 8: Receive the printout from the business registry (Handelsregistrar) showing that the business is really registered, with a number. Send this document to the bank so they can remove “i.G.” from the account name.
  • Profit.

Munich’s big square computer

I noticed this post about Munich’s new LRZ supercomputer in Garching on Moritz Angermann’s blog. Looking at this photo (webcam apparently, so maybe you can only see it in the daylight), there’s something faintly absurd about it. Apparently this big cube building (at the right) is the computer, or can be perceived as the computer because it’s dealt with remotely. This might be a picture of the inside, but I’d still rather think of the building as the computer. It’s just a very big computer, you see.

I’ve never been to Garching, but I keep meeting clever people who work there.

Party, Football, etc.

We finally had our apartment-warming party, which turned out really well, with lots of our favourite people and the drama of a German goal to win in the 91st minute.

Josh made the journey to Munich. He’s recently been in Austria doing some German-language Ubuntu Linux training videos with Video2Brain. They sound like a great bunch of people and I imagine that the result will be a really useful addition to their catalogue. His video should be available soon. Of course, if he found the time to blog then I wouldn’t have to be the definitive source of Josh-related information.

The day after the party we took a weary walk around the Viertel and visited the beach bar on the bridge over the Isar.

IMG_0947

Munich’s LiMux to use KDE

I’m probably a bit late with this, but I just noticed that Munich council decided to use KDE for their desktop. I think they announced it quietly in January 2006.

As someone interested in showing how Linux can finally make life better for users, and thus make the world a better place, this is a bit depressing to me. If Munich’s employees get a standard KDE desktop then they will be overwhelmed with its complexity, technical orientation, and inconsistency.

I know I should be glad that it’s a Linux and Free Software project, but I’d like it to be a success, and I don’t want to spend the next ten years hearing from people here about how much they hate it, and having to explain that that’s not what I do, and that’s not how it has to be. However, the project’s managers have otherwise seemed to be very smart and pragmatic, so I guess there’s a chance that they will heavily customize it, and this might be a wake-up call to the KDE developers that not all users are geeks, or that not all people should be forced to think like geeks, and that confused users should not be dismissed as too stupid to use a computer. Maybe there will be more in their LinuxTag 2006 presentation about how they made the decision.

(This is my personal opinion and not the official opinion of the GNOME project.)

Security versus satisfaction

I had an interesting interview today for a contract in Munich, involving embedded Linux and VoIP. That’s good technology to work with, but the project is likely to be otherwise quite conservative. It would offer reliable income for a few months without being away from home.

The downside is that I’ve been thinking again about starting a company, because I’m seeing increasing demand for open source consulting, particularly with embedded GTK+/gtkmm. And I believe that Glom consulting can be a winner in the next few years. I think demand will increase more if I can offer a corporate partner with a pool of employees. One of my problems at the moment is that there aren’t currently many good employee candidates in Germany. Many of the best German GNOME developers have been snapped up by other companies, and most of the others that I strongly admire are still students so I’d feel bad about tempting them away.. Some people have already received emails asking if they’d be interested if I manage to find enough business to support them, just in case. I would really want my Openismus company to mentor new developers, but I think I need some dependable people to start with.

Maybe this will work out, but I guess I’ll get an offer about this contract in the next couple of days, so I may have to decide whether or not to risk seeing if things work out. A company, with sizable contracts, would insulate me from having to make these decisions every now and then.

W-8BEN (U.S. Tax Withholding)

One of my clients in the U.S. requires me to fill out a W-8BEN IRS form. This is quite normal and probably should have happened with my other clients. It allows them to not withhold 30% of my payments, because I’ll be taxed on that income in my own country, under income tax treaties, and double-taxation would be unkind.

However, to get that exemption, W-8BEN seems to require that I have, or apply-for, an SSN (Social Security Number) or ITN. The W-8BEN instructions suggest that SSN is what I should have, but the suggested SS-5 form for getting one demands that I “provide a document from the U.S. government agency that explains why you need a Social Security number and that you meet all of the requirements for a Federal benefit except for the number.” What agency? W-8BEN told me to get it. W-8BEN, talk to SS-5.

The alternative, ITN (Individual Taxpayer Identification), which I can obtain via a W-7 form, should only be provided if I’m not eligible for an SSN. I’m not sure if I’m eligible.

And both the SSN and ITN application forms seem to rquire that I supply originals of identification documents, usually a passport. I’m not that happy about sending my passport to the U.S. for a few weeks.

Help?

Update: It’s amazing how quickly I can get such good advice via my blog. Thanks. It seems like a visit to the U.S. consulate/embassy is the way to do this.